Wednesday, December 24, 2008


NATIONAL ECONOMIC POLICY -AN ANALYSIS
The national economic policy which the Barisan Nasional government in the past had harped and was proud of bred rampant corruption, abuse of power, in competency and ali-baba dealings. It was a policy that had failed and in which had created a greater wedge between the haves and haves not. Those who are rich are only handful people in the corridors of power who got their riches at the expense of not only of their blind followers, but, at the majority of the people in the nation. The New Economic Policy was supposed to help the bumiputeras, but, only those handful people in the corridors of power could really enjoy its benefit over the rest of other bumiputras. The people in the corridors of power took advantage of the New Economic Policy (“NEP”) and with their acquired riches, one thing for them to know is that all of us only eat three meals a day and this was a norm imposed by God on us and we should be happy of this. Even if one can be richer and could enjoy the acquired wealth with the help of the NEP, that wealth could not be brought to the graves.

Those who benefited and became rich should also be told of what the doctors had used to warn us of over eating. The more meals you eat, the faster you go to medical centres for treatment! This is because excessive meals cannot keep us fit and healthy! What a waste and the bills from private medical centres are not cheap either!

To those who get rich with the help of the New Economic Policy, please do not forget the people and the down trodden people that need your help. Do not think you are Lord because with your unjustified wealth, God’s willing the wealth can be robbed from you!

The New Economic Policy had failed as we here still have people who robbed, steal and cheat and it was a shock when a father had to steal to make a living for his family and when arrested, he suffers the embarrassment of arrest in the eyes of his children! His shame will be very unbearable and his liberty will then be left at the mercy of the law.

The New Economic Policy also had caused widespread unhappiness among non-muslim Bumiputeras.

In the civil service, we could see widespread discrimination in promotion of civil servants involving non-muslim bumiputeras in East Malaysia. Despite being the majority numerically in both states they had been treated as “third class” when it comes to government help. They were also treated third-class by being denied discounts when buying property in West Malaysia. I have also heard constant complaints by non-muslim bumiputeras their unhappiness on such as matters touching on job opportunities in the civil service, Public Services Department scholarships overseas, business licences and government contracts. The majority of non-muslim bumiputeras will remain poor and it would therefore impossible to see them able to compete with other races.

These showed that the New Economic Policy which ended officially in 1990 was a failure and when there were cries that this policy should be corrected or changed, people from the Barisan Nasional was too protective of this. When the Policy was replaced by the National Development Policy, many of those in the Barisan Nasional also refused to recognize this. Why? Is it because they were all afraid that they no more will enjoy what you had enjoyed under the NEP. They may also be afraid that other people who are poor out there will share part of what you had all these while enjoyed?

When the New Economic Policy, has failed to shape the society to a more equitable distribution of wealth which had caused the gap between the poor and the rich became wider and where better harmony and peace could not be achieved, why should we cling to such a policy? The Barisan Nasional government has come with the National Development Policy in 1991 and this new policy was supposed to correct the imbalances or evils created by the New Economic Policy. It was also designed to narrow down the gap between the poor and the rich of all races, then why still shout of the New Economic Policy?

The Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi in his maiden speech as United Malays National Organization (UMNO) president in the UMNO general assembly in 2004 had stated that “Let’s not use the crutches for support all the time, the knee will become weak”. The Prime Minister also went to say that the continued use of the crutches would eventually in need of a wheelchair instead. This is because those who acquired wealth this way will never learn the ropes of business well as their survival was too dependant on the government and they were so used to it, making them “subsidy businessmen” and this may cause them not to have the skill to compete at global stage. Their acquired wealth in this way if invested outside Malaysia will see them collapse and once collapse the only way to float will be to seek the government to bail them out. In the end caused by these bail-outs, the country’s economy will also collapse. This was what was meant by the Prime Minister that the continued use of the crutches will eventually lead to the use of wheelchair.

The warning by the Prime Minister in 2004 should be taken seriously and if we are not careful, it will create more social ills and can spark into civil unrests. Civil unrests may follow if only a handful of persons could really benefit out of the New Economic Policy. The larger population who do not benefit from the NEP may take their grievances to the streets and this can cause the fall of our social order.

The NEP had somehow or rather scared away foreign investments and had made the rich non-malays shifted their investments overseas and now many have went to China, where the market is too huge to capture. We must not forget that in 2005, foreign investments fell by USD4 billion, or 14% and we should not deny that NEP has something to do with the decline of foreign investments.

Those who have been left out of the NEP has kept on growing and being left out, they will have no choice, but, to join hands with those who opposed this policy to no more support their allegiance to the BN government. The time is now near that BN government will see that the evils of the NEP will cause the BN government to collapse and be taken over by the Opposition. Come next parliamentary election, if BN will not be lucky, their seats may fall one by one like dominos.



Thursday, December 18, 2008

DAP SARAWAK 30TH ANNIVERSARY

Wow... 特别设计的砂州民主行动党30周年纪念大蛋糕, 好好吃哦!


来来大家来切蛋糕咯。。。


来,打个招呼吧。。。这是我们的主宾桌!!



虽然下了场雨,但现场还是好热闹哦。。。

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Chinese Education – Who to Blame?

(古晋17日讯) 行动党巴都林当区州议员温利山律师说,华社要确保国内的华教获得良好发展和获得维护,已经不能再依靠国阵政府,而是民联政府。

温利山指出,行动党为华校所做的丰功伟绩只需数个月时间就达成,然而国阵包括其成员党如人联、马华、民政、民进党和人民党却在过去50年仍无法做到。

他今日在一项记者招待会上说,有鉴于此,他吁请华社把国阵政府拉下台,让行动党及其他反对党取而代之,请给民联一个机会,他同时承诺在一年内可达成援助华教的目标。

“华社应该明白,国阵政府只为华教做一点微不足道贡献,其实是自取其辱,反观由民联所执政的州属却为华教做出卓越贡献,例如由回教党所领导的吉兰丹政府,为该州唯一华文独中拨给一千依甲土地,在霹雳州民联政府拨出2500依甲土地予州内9间独中以供以地养校,80年代由拜林领导的团结党沙巴州政府也每年拨出百余万令吉予州内独中,同样的由行动党秘书长林冠英领导的槟城州政府也宣布在每年州财政预算案制度化拨出一百万令吉予州内5间独中。”

温利上说,在英殖民政府统治下的砂劳越,在推广华文教育方面不曾面对诸多难题。最少在英人离开本州时,我们在古晋拥有5间华小即一小至五小。然而自砂州获独立45年以来,虽然华裔人口逐年增加,古晋市只在巴都林当州选区增建一间六小,这也是当时国阵候选人宋瑞源要击败行动党强人沈观仰而许下建校的诺言。

“当时沈观仰身为古晋区三届国会议员败下阵来,是因为当时华社被洗脑,以为行动党无法建六小,而国阵及其成员党人联却能。然而能兴建六小并非单靠国阵拨款,华社也出钱出力,其中包括行动党在向华社劝捐建校基金也扮演重要角色。”

“此事也证明人联党在说服国阵政府全面资助建校基金,以避免向华社劝捐方面,显得无能为力。”
他说,在数年前实旦宾国会议席竞选期间,行动党也提出在达闽再也、BDC与实都东区没有华人课题。由于这些地区是华人人口最稠密区,后来华社决定要把二小搬迁到实都东。当丹斯里陈伯勤因人联拖欠建校费用予Global Upline Sdn. Bhd.进行封校时,华社针对此事就互相指责和推卸责任。
“令人遗憾的是,作为维护华文教育的董教总也被一些人拖下水,并指责董教总一些领袖没有捐献新二小建校经费,而董教总的任务只需负责一些志愿工作和负责监督华教获维护与发展。在必要时,董教总可针对政府政策威胁到华校与被边缘化,向政府提呈备忘录,就如2005年初,董教总率领国内7个主要华团,联合向政府建议:为迎合城市需求及国阵政府在2004年大选向人民许下的承诺,需兴建更多华小。”

温利山提醒华社,国阵政府向来喜欢许下承诺,然而大选一过,国阵人联党就会忘记承诺,这就是为什么董教总带领国内主要华团向政府针对大选诺言,提呈备忘录予政府。

“一旦国阵老大巫统感到不悦,就会指责华社领袖分裂马来西亚人,巫统领袖在成功鼓吹种族紧张关系后,由于害怕在1960年内安法令下展开大逮捕行动,华人被迫保持沉默,华社也开始收回对董教总的精神支持。导致它陷入困境。

温利山指出,这是须对症下药的华社通病。我们总不能在面对危机时就把自己包藏起来。
提及他对搬迁与拆除二小的立场时,他说,“尽管新校舍已成功建梭,但我在展开竞选运动时,我坚持反对二小从现址搬迁,因为它是一间具有历史性和文化价值学校。我在竞选时是要求政府在达闽再也,BDC和实都东区建立一间华小。我的计划是要见到七小在古晋兴建起来,并在稍后才处理二小问题。

温氏吁请当局现阶段不要搬迁和拆除二小以充作拟议中供泊车用途,同样的也不可牺牲华社利益,让一些有心人士把该地区建成一个商业中心或旅馆。

也是行动党砂州财政的温氏说,国阵政府里是以马来人或回教徒占多数的巫统和土保党主宰,内里的小成员党被老大欺凌和不大敢发言。然而老大非常了解华社的弱点,那就是华社喜欢内斗,但对自己的权益与文化受到威胁,却不曾向马来人和外国人据理力争。所以在争取国家经济和社会控制权,老大就可轻易控制我们华社,那就是觅策,让华社针对热门课题互相指责与争吵。

“国阵老大知道华社较热衷于赚钱,而不喜欢向其他民族或外国人找麻烦。我们可以回忆华人在团结方面的弱点,所以华人被称为“东亚病夫”并不为奇。直到现在我们仍在内斗,这可从我们社团与政党内斗非常惨烈看得出来。但在对抗其他族群时,华社就显得无助和成为病夫。”

他说,所以母语教育领域可以由老大轻易利用。我们的领袖也轻易在国州议会内外陷入他们所设的陷阱。副首长丹斯里陈康南及人联党已落入陷阱,当他质问张健仁伟华校作出什么贡献,已把行动党拉下水,也意味着陈康南质疑行动党对华校所作贡献。肯定的行动党通过张健仁不会保持沉默,并找机会攻击陈康南和人联党。所以国阵老大就在笑看华社内争。

温利山说,砂州华教被边缘化,副首长陈康南应该指责人联党和本身的无能。其实发展母语教育是政府的责任,这些都证明在联邦与州宪法里,所以母语教育根本不应该成为任何政治课题。他们所需要的是在内阁争取华社权益和华教发展,那就是在内阁里向老大争取,由于行动党并没有在在联邦政府里,所以行动党在政府外支持这项斗争。

“由于教育包括母语教育获得宪法保障,所以华社不应再在这个经济萎缩之际,在花时间去筹款和掏空他们的钱包,有鉴于此,指责张健仁或行动党和董教总没有捐款予华教是不对的,因为宪法已证明政府须资助教育事业。”

温利山说,由于国阵华基政党如马华、民政党、人联党、人民党的懦弱,使华社权益受损,每年父母在为他们儿女报读华小面对困难。

“从1987年至1998年,国内的华小从1295间减少至1283间,然而国小从4856间增加至5283间。以2004年来说,国内总共7595间小学中,华小只占1287间,彼此的落差非常大,这清楚显示马华、民政党和人联党屈服于巫统和土保党,在国阵政府里并没有被视为同等伙伴,其实他们应该告诉巫统和土保党应该更尊重宪法,以及对华裔需求具有敏感度,因为他是国内第二大民族。”

温利山律师说,在他接手处理圣玛汀学校案件,为贫妇争回被政府霸占的土地时,有些人民已在质疑国内国小太多,并质问为何不关掉多余的国小,但他无法回答人民这种问题。

他说,人民认为太多的国小意味浪费人民公款,然而国内的教育水准却大跌。反之政府应该更注重华文与英文教育,因为这2种语言在通讯,科技与商业都是全球广泛通用的语言。

“人民认为政府可把不必要的国小关闭后,有关款项就可用来发展落在后头的华教,同时也可把这些国小改为华小。”

提到圣玛汀学校案件时,温利山说,政府霸占贫妇米拉的土地,把原本的一间基督教会学校,擅自改制为国小,现在他已成功通过法律程序为该贫妇争回土地,圣玛汀国小也搬迁到附近一间设备更好的学校,不过令人遗憾的,在该土地的一间教堂已被拆除。


14th DAP SARAWAK STATE ANNUAL CONVENTION






YB及党员们在大门口迎接槟州首席部长林冠英的莅临。


党员们以掌声欢迎槟州首席部长林冠英进入会议厅。

领袖们专心聆听槟州首长的演讲。
他跟大家分享槟州的未来计划,内容十分精彩。




党员们全神贯注聆听领袖们的演讲。

CHINESE EDUCATION POLITICIZED– WHO TO BLAME?




When the British were still here, we never had much problem in promoting Chinese education. At least, when they left Sarawak, we have five Chinese schools in Kuching, that is, Chung Hua School No.1 to Chung Hua School No.5. Forty-five years after the British left, despite the growing Chinese population, Kuching City could only be proud of one more Chinese school, that is, Chung Hua School No. 6 in the Batu Lintang Constituency. It only materialized after bitter campaign by the DAP for another chinese school. The campaign for this Chung Hua School No.6 was very bitter which led to the defeat of the then strongman of the DAP, Sdr. Sim Kwang Yang, in an election against Song Swee Guan of SUPP. DAP was defeated because the Chinese community was “brainwashed” to accept the thought that DAP could not build the school, but, the BN government of which SUPP was a partner could. Chung Hua School No. 6 could only be built not solely with government money, but, also public money from the Chinese community of which DAP also played an important part in raising funds for the school building by persuading the Chinese community to donate to the school building. To get the Chinese community involved in the raising of funds by SUPP for the school shows that the SUPP representation in the BN government was weak in convincing their ruling partners to accept the fact that being the government of the day, the BN government should single handedly be responsible for the building of the school without the involvement of the Chinese community.

Over crowding in classrooms and lack of Chinese schools were very much felt during that time which led to the campaign for Chung Hua School No.6 and the problem remains the same until this day.

The issue for another Chinese school heated up again some years ago. For the fight of the Stampin Parliamentary Constituency, DAP raised the issue of no Chinese school within the Tabuan Jaya, BDC and Stutong area. This area had the highest Chinese population in the state. This issue later led to the Chinese community to decide in shifting Chung Hua No.2 to the present site at Stutong. When Tan Sri Ting Pek Kiing locked the school for sums allegedly owed in the construction of the school to Global Upline Sdn. Bhd. many leaders of the Chinese community were throwing mud at each other over the issue of contribution to Chinese education and debts owed in the construction of the school.

Role of Dong Jiao Zong
Regrettably, Dong Jiao Zong, which is the umbrella to protect Chinese education, was also pulled into the “scuffle” by the some parties by saying that some of the leaders in Dong Jiao Zong was not contributing to building fund of the new Chung Hua School No 2. This should not have been done because it is the government, not Dong Jiao Zong that has to build schools for the Chinese community. Dong Jiao Zong was only doing voluntary work all these years and the task of Dong Jiao Zong was only to see that Chinese education be protected and be developed, where necessary, by submitting relevant proposals to the government whenever Chinese education be threatened or been marginalized by government policy. This was exactly was done in early 2005 where Dong Jiao Zong led seven major Chinese associations in the country to jointly submit proposals to the government urging it to build more Chinese primary schools to meet the needs of the urban community in line with the promise by the BN government in 2004 General Election. To this, the Chinese community should be reminded that the BN government was always good at giving promises, but, when elections were over, the BN government of which SUPP is a partner always forgot their promises and it was this reason that moved Dong Jiao Zong to lead the major Chinese associations in the country to send a memorandum to the government over the promise made.

Of course, when the “Big Brother”, UMNO was not happy, the Chinese leaders were accused of disuniting the Malaysian community. Racial tension was felt and was successfully engineered by many UMNO leaders and this of course, led to the fear of mass arrest under the Internal Security Act 1960 and the Chinese were then forced to keep quiet and the community began to withdraw their moral support for Dong Jiao Zong, thus, leaving Dong Jiao Zong in difficult times. This is a sickness that we in the Chinese community must find a medicine to cure and in times of crisis we should not, like stage actors in opera houses, hide our faces with masks and talk with masks.

My Stand over the removal and demolition of Chung Hua School No.2
Although the building of the school at the new site is a success, in my election campaigns I opposed the moving of this Chung Hua School No. 2 from the present site. It is a school of historical and cultural values which has to be preserved. In my campaign for the fight of the Stampin Parliamentary Constituency, I just had wanted a Chinese school to be built in the Tabuan Jaya, BDC and Stutong area. My plan was to see another Chinese school, that is, Chung Hua School No. 7 in Kuching and to tackle the problem of Chung Hua School No. 2 later. Now, with the new school to cater the Chinese community at the Tabuan Jaya, BDC and Stutong area, I plead with the relevant authorities that Chung School Hua No. 2 should not at this moment be moved out yet and be demolished to give way to car parks as proposed. Neither should the site at this moment be turned into a commercial centre or a hotel by some interested parties at the expense of the Chinese community in Padungan and main bazaar areas.

Big Brothers controlled Chinese Education
In the BN government, the “Big Brothers” are UMNO and PBB and the majority of those in these parties are malays or muslims. They were big bullies of smaller parties within the coalition and being “Big Brothers”, others have little say. These “Big Brothers” knew very well the weaknesses of the Chinese community, that is, the Chinese people were always quarrelsome among themselves but never would quarrel or fight against the malays and foreign people even though their rights and culture been threatened. So in the fight for economic and social control of this country, it was very easy for the “Big Brothers” to control our Chinese community. A thing the “Big Brothers” would do to control the economic and social pattern in Malaysia was to find ways to get the Chinese community pointing fingers and blaming each other over the issues close to their heart.

The “Big Brothers” knew that the Chinese community prefers to make as much money as possible rather than to find trouble with other communities or foreigners. We can recall history about this and that our Chinese people were weak to stand up together and it was little wonder that we Chinese had been branded as “Sick men of Asia”, an image which we Chinese should all try to correct. Until today we still fight against each other and we should be able to observe this in what are happening in our associations and political parties where there were back stabbings and such fights were always very bitter. But, when coming in confrontation with other communities we just were helpless and became sick people.

So, education of the mother tongue is one area that can easily be exploited by the “Big Brothers” and our leaders easily fell into their trap inside and outside Parliament and Legislative Assemblies. DCM Tan Sri George Chan and his Party, SUPP felled into the trap when he unwittingly pulled the DAP into the arena by questioning our Chong Chieng Jen’s contribution to Chinese schools. By questioning our DAP’s Chong Chieng Jen, Dr. George Chan, therefore, was questioning the contribution of the DAP to Chinese education. Definitely, DAP through Chong Chieng Jen, would not keep quiet and has therefore, to find the opportunity to attack Tan Sri George Chan and his Party, SUPP. So, instead of working together to find a solution, both the DAP and SUPP were throwing mud at each other, thus, giving the “Big Brothers” the time to laugh and the fun to watch at what our Chinese leaders in these two Parties are doing.
The Chinese community has to be informed that the Chinese community is well represented in the BN government by parties like MCA, Gerakan, SUPP, PRS, SPDP and SAPP, to name a few. For the marginalization of the Chinese education in the state, DCM Tan Sri George Chan has to blame his Party and himself. They are in the government and education inclusive the education of the mother tongue is the responsibility of the government and this has been provided for by the Federal and State Constitutions and therefore, there should not be any political issue at all arising in connection with the education of the mother tongue. What they should have done was to fight for the Chinese rights and Chinese education within the Cabinet, that is, fight the “Big Brother” within the Cabinet and since DAP is not in the government, the DAP then support the fight from outside the government.

Since education inclusive of education of the mother tongue is provided for by the Constitutions, the Chinese community should no more be allowed, especially at this time of bad economy, to spend time to raise funds and to dig into their pockets. Therefore, to accuse Chong Chieng Jen or the DAP and Dong Jiao Zong of contributing nothing at all to Chinese education is wrong as mother tongue education, being provided for by the Constitutions should not arise at all. Therefore, it is for parties like MCA, Gerakan, SUPP, PRS and SAPP who are in the government to see that the need of the Chinese community is taken care of.

It is because of the weaknesses in parties like MCA, Gerakan, SUPP, PRS and SAPP that the Chinese community has suffered so much and each year parents found it more difficult to find Chinese schools for their children.

Between 1987 and 1998, Chinese primary schools in Malaysia dropped from 1,295 to 1,283 while the number of malay medium schools rose from 4,856 to 5,283. In 2004 three were 1,287 Chinese primary schools out of a total of 7,595 primary schools. The gap was too big. This clearly shows that Chinese based parties like MCA, Gerakan and SUPP had always been subservient to UMNO and PBB and had not been treated as equal partners in the BN government. They should tell UMNO and PBB to show more respect to the Constitutions and be more sensitive to Chinese needs as it is the second largest race in Malaysia.

Reduce malay medium schools?
In the past 50 years the government led by UMNO and PBB saw malay medium government schools mushrooming and Christian schools which used English as medium of instructions were also turned by the government into malay medium schools. One of such schools was on Millah’s land and the school was unlawfully built on the land by the government. A chapel built by Millah’s late father to preach and to propagate the Christianity was demolished without the knowledge and consent of Millah to give way to the building of this malay medium school.

It was a sad thing that in seeking justice for Millah I was accused of closing down the malay medium school built on Millah’s land, but, nobody questioned the government who trespassed Millah’s land how the chapel that was used to propagate Christianity on Millah’s land had been demolished. What power I had to close the school if not the government itself?

During the last General Election, to the development of these malay medium schools many voters asked me why the Chinese community had failed to take a stand to persuade the BN government to reduce the number of malay medium schools as too much money has been spent on them and yet, the standard of education in the country has dropped drastically over the years. They said the money spent for malay medium schools was not that worthwhile and should be better spent to expand English and Chinese education as both English and Chinese medium education have huge global usage for communication, science and business. I could not answer their queries as this was the policy of the BN government.

Many of these voters also suggest that the BN government should be told to close some of the malay medium schools and their funds be then be used to develop Chinese education, which at this moment is very far lagging behind in development. Alternatively, they suggested that some of these malay schools should be converted into Chinese schools because at this moment, as argued by them, there was no need for too many malay schools because malay education could be supplemented by the private sectors. To this, maybe political parties like SUPP, MCA, Gerakan and PBS may wish to convey these views to their partners in the BN government. I have no answer for this because DAP is not in the government.

The Chinese community should be informed that it is a shame to the BN government for doing too little to Chinese education when states held by the Opposition could do better. Take for example, in Kelantan led by PAS, the Chinese community was given 1000 acres of land and in Perak, the Pakatan Rakyat government gave about 2,500 acres to develop Chinese education. When PBS ruled Sabah under Pairin Katingan, the PBS government gave grants to Chinese schools. So is also Penang, the five Chinese schools in Penang has been given a sum of RM1 million by the DAP led government and this was approved in the Penang state recent annual budget.

The dream of the Chinese community to ensure the development and protection of Chinese education in Malaysia, therefore, does not lie with the BN government, but in the Pakatan Rakyat government and the DAP who could achieved this within just a few months, but, of which such feat could not been done by the BN government in the past 50 years of which SUPP, MCA, Gerakan, SPDP and PRS were partners.

So come this next election, I hereby persuade the Chinese to remove the BN government and put the DAP and get other opposition parties to replace the BN. Give us a chance and we promise we can do it within one year although after fifty years, SUPP and other Chinese dominated political parties could still not be able to do this.